- Norway's Barnevernet: They took our four children… then the baby - BBC News;
- Gumbo: Celebration of African American Writers!
- When CPS Kidnaps Children for Money;
- Vermeer in Words!
According to the couple, Suzy would be drugged, forcibly given a C-section, and her baby taken. Months later, and after multiple reports of the suffering of their newborn daughter Sofia, they are still fighting to get her back. Suzy and Peter then left their two older boys with family, and drove to a place they have been wanting to visit. However, they would never make it. As the couple drove to Maine, Suzy began to experience some pain, so they decided to stop at a hospital in Connecticut. As Medical Kidnap reports:.
His family in Egypt are Coptic Christians, a minority group in a country that is predominately Muslim. Before they fully understood what was happening, Peter was allegedly being accused of being a Muslim terrorist and fleeing the law, and Suzy was being accused of being a drug addict, simply because she had some prescription medications with her to treat her high blood pressure and diabetes.
The couple filmed their interactions with the hospital staff and at no time did they appear to be on drugs or any threat whatsoever to their baby Sofia.
According to the family, after Sofia was born, things got even worse. After I continued to complain about it and as it continued to climb, they finally gave me my beta blocker but still refused to give me my diabetes medicine. The next morning when we awoke, my blood sugar was also very high and they finally gave me the Metformin I was prescribed by my general practitioner. We explained to him everything that had happened and that I was made to go the entire previous day without any of my medications, that I had been in excruciating pain and that we were both exhausted and just needed some sleep.
He told us that we would be allowed to see her only for feedings and that if we missed even one more single feeding, that we would not be allowed to see her anymore. I asked him if I signed the medical releases and we make her an appointment with a pediatrician in CT, would we be allowed to keep our daughter and take her home?
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our book!
The couple has since started an online petition and a GoFundMe page to help with bills related to getting their daughter back. They say they have been falsely charged with bogus accusations and never been arrested. Consider the case of Isaiah Rider. Doctors diagnosed Isaiah with neurofibromatosis, a rare disorder that produces painful tumors on the nerves. The battle began when on April 15, hospital officials reported to the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services DCFS that Michelle was preventing her child from receiving necessary medical care, and the agency ordered that Isaiah be involuntarily committed until the doctors decided he could go home!
Next, DCFS informed Michelle in a phone call that she was not allowed to visit her son and that when he was eventually released from the hospital he would be placed in foster care. On May 6, Isaiah was released from the hospital and placed in a foster home in the notoriously dangerous inner-city ghetto of Chicago.
- Legally Kidnapped By CPS (child protective services);
- Stay Informed.
- Healing through Plant Power, Word Power.
- Nadeshda l espoir américain du comte Rezanov (French Edition).
His mother was not notified and was not allowed to visit her son. She was being severely punished for deigning to question medical officialdom. After six months living in that nightmare, which reportedly included being forcibly sodomized while in state custody, Isaiah was transferred from Chicago to a foster home in Missouri, his home state and the state where his mother resided.
Illinois, however, retained legal custody over the boy and informed his mother that while Isaiah was in Missouri, she was not to have unapproved contact with her son. Should she fail to comply with these orders, officials of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services warned Michelle that Isaiah would be immediately returned to Illinois. The fight to have her son freed from the foster system raged on for more than two years — days, to be precise — and just two months before Isaiah turned 19, an Illinois family court judge ordered the case closed and Michelle Rider was reunited with her son.
The same thing, says former Oregon prosecutor Robert Weidner, that motivates it to place 3. Rather than seeking the well-being of the child, then, it appears that, like most every other agency of the federal and state governments, CPS secures its continued funding and the paychecks of the thousands of workers employed by the agency by incrementally increasing the sphere of its oversight into the lives of American families.
Imagine the destruction wrought to families, the abuse inflicted upon children by caretakers, and the irreparable harm done to the reputations of families all in the name of securing funding. Parents are relegated to a middle-management role in the care of children, subject to the dictates of government apparatchiks who, when the cash flow is threatened, will use even the slightest suspicion or weak rationale to demolish families so that the spigot of federal funding stays open.
There are means, however, of proactively denying this deplorable dominion to CPS, an agency, as has been explained, possessed of police-like power over the welfare of American children and the stability and sanctity of American families. Listed here are a few tactics proven to prevent the anti-family government establishment from interfering in the life of your family:. Most parents become intimidated by the brusque nature of the workers, and allow them inside their homes; and once they are inside the home, they will do their utmost to find some form of evidence against you.
An ex-CPS worker mentioned this, saying:. I wish I could shout from the highest mountain to parents to vigilantly learn their rights! If they knew what their legal rights were there would be significantly lower numbers of child removals. Social workers, unlike policemen making an arrest, are not required to inform the parents of their legal rights. All we had to do to remove a child was to show up at the home and tell the parents we came to remove the kids.
Often times we would take a police officer with us never telling the parents he was there for protection, not to enforce an order or warrant. But if they had legally known their parental rights, they could simply have told me that I could not take the children unless I had a court order signed by the judge or had a warrant to remove the kids. By the use of intimidation tactics, a plethora of children have been snatched from their homes by CPS. If informed, CPS is legally required to bring a warrant in order to search your house, and even then, only to a limited extent.
Should they try to barge into your house anyway, you have every right to call the authorities, or even initiate a court hearing regarding their lack of adherence to the Constitution. Corey Chaney and April Rodgers learned this for themselves when they were reported to CPS not once, but six times — thanks to a next-door neighbor. Rodgers said the couple pleaded with CPS workers to consider whether someone was making false calls.
While it would be much better to do away with the CPS hotline entirely, until that happens, it seems that staying in touch with neighbors, friends, and family would be a way to keep CPS out of the loop, providing each other with a way of handling any perceived problems at home. If CPS still comes knocking at your door, make sure to keep data. One of the most useful methods is to purchase a recorder, and record all interactions with CPS. The modus operandi of CPS in light of its mission statement and funding demands described above is to consider parents guilty until proven innocent.
Such a presumption could later prevent parents from collecting and presenting evidence of their innocence, evidence that would prove invaluable should the case proceed to court. Thus, when looking for an attorney, it is imperative that one chooses an attorney with years of experience fighting CPS. Often, CPS itself provides a list of family law attorneys to families being investigated by the agency, creating a conflict of interest that might escape notice by a family frightened by the traumatic turn of events that accompanies CPS intervention.
The Ohio family had been fighting the state for several weeks concerning the right to determine what is and is not in the best interest of their child, seven-year-old Camden Maple, when they discovered that their attorney had chosen to withhold information from the case, which could have ended the investigation much more quickly. Christian and Katie Maple then proceeded to have a long discussion with Camden about his behavior, believing that they had solved the matter on the family level.
Maple, somewhat perplexed that the school would continue contacting them regarding the raising of their son, nevertheless explained that they had addressed the situation without the need of psychological or any other type of medical intervention.
The school has tried on several occasions to get us to have him diagnosed, so that he can be medicated. Christian and Katie Maple are a typical health-conscious family. Their only flaw, as CPS would put it, is that they chose a medical choice for Camden contrary to what the school wanted. Camden has been tested a full grade level above his current grade. When the class has assignments, he often finishes before the rest of the class, and spends the rest of the time drawing.
When the teacher notices that Camden is drawing, Camden is punished for his creativity.
It was from this interview that the school contacted the parents, and demanded that Camden receive medical attention. If we really believed that he would have really hurt himself, then we would have taken him to be assessed.
When CPS Kidnaps Children for Money
To his credit, Christian refused to allow the agents into the house, citing the rights against such intrusions that are protected by the Fourth Amendment. At the hearing, a pattern of school-incited CPS persecution of the Maples was revealed. The school had contacted CPS on four other occasions within the past year regarding Camden.
Maple testified. Regardless of the lack of reasonable cause, on March 3 the court ordered that Camden be seized by CPS and forcibly removed from his family.
corruption | blaccalseogargard.ga
That afternoon, social workers and police officers arrived to take Camden into state custody. The parents were then subjected to drug tests and psychological evaluations — all of which they passed. The Maples were a normal family with one unforgivable flaw: They dared defy the state and its irresistible, unquestionable, unconstitutional claim to control the lives of every American from cradle to grave. In this case, the Maples took on CPS and they must now pay for that transgression by being denied the right to raise their son. Maple revealed to this author that the Maples fired their first attorney after they discovered he was acting against their interests and trying to negotiate a deal with CPS, a deal the Maples did not want.
Make sure that your attorney is well-verified by other parents who were once in your shoes, as they would know whether or not that attorney will ensure the preservation of your family. Otherwise, CPS will use your stress or anger as the excuse they need to say that they feel the child is in danger, and get a warrant issued and start court hearings. Thus, as difficult as it may be, be sure to remain calm and polite when discussing a situation with CPS agents. The moment you lose your temper is the moment they have leverage over you. Be sure to ask the agents what exactly you have been accused of, and request to see a warrant.
If they have neither an explanation nor a warrant, feel free to politely send them away, or request that they bring a warrant before trying to enter your house. Gregory A. And the long delay is really detrimental to your case. This deprives you of receiving the legal protections provided by the state and federal constitutions and that you are innocent until you are proven guilty.
DCFS gives you none of these things…. Parents do not have the right to due process. You can fight all you want at the pre-trial hearings, if you are lucky enough to secure them, but the judge will never let you present your side in full. Remembering that perverse pecuniary arrangement might motivate parents to stay on top of every communication between CPS and district attorneys, judges, and other magistrates appointed to oversee the legality of the proceedings. Any privations suffered by parents and their children — including the experience of the child while in foster care or CPS custody — must be shouted from the rooftops over and over again at every level and every step of the legal proceedings.
Part of this necessary awareness and accountability is to ensure that a family has its name — including the names of the children — expunged from CPS databases.
Related Not My Children: A True Story of CPS and Government Funded Kidnappers
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved